Monday, November 13, 2006

Three different things came to my attention this last few weeks and I need to process what I’m learning. So for the want of a good starting point I will just start and then see where it takes me. The first is that my husband sent me a column by Doug Giles called An acid test for pastors part II. This is an article on Townhall.com that really is pretty harsh, but it definitely gives one something to think about. Doug Giles gives ten reasons why pastors today do not speak out against the moral and political decay of today’s society. Of course, he goes into much more detail and as the title states, he isn’t gentle in his criticism. But he has captured what a lot of people feel and he captured the longing for leaders that have vision and are willing to take a stand that I see as a common thread in Christianity throughout America.
The reasons he gives for not standing up are;
1. They fear man
2. They are ignorant about the current issues
3. They hate divisive issues
4. They believe we are at the end of the world, so why bother?
5. They are lazy
6. They don’t want to lose their tax exempt status
7. They think that earthly concerns are beyond them
8. They don’t want to be lumped in with the Taliban as radically religious
9. They are too busy with committees and other ‘church’ activities
10. They are afraid that taking a stand will chase away the money

The second thing that happened is that Ted Haggard, pastor of a 14,000 member Conservative Christian church was caught and finally confessed to being “sexually immoral”. Now Ted Haggard would have passed Doug Guiles’ acid test. It is obvious that the members of his church appreciated that he stood for something. It was attractive to them. He was very vocally pro-Israel and anti-gay marriage. He took a stand on the moral and political issues of the times. Doug Guiles would be proud. Even so, while Ted Haggard was outspoken against homosexuals he was having a three year tryst with a gay prostitute who sold him drugs and provided him with ‘massages’.

So I guess that I’d add another reason for pastor’s not speaking out against the issues. If a pastor is honest -- it’s hard to speak against sins that are pets. Whether he has confessed and repented of his sins or is sweeping them under the carpet -- speaking out about them is not a comfortable place to be. Maybe it is because he is lazy or complacent or has his conscience seared so that he can no longer see the sin. Maybe he is compassionate and doesn’t want to ‘throw the first stone’. Maybe it’s because he doesn’t know about confession, repentance and healing. Maybe someone should have been counseling Ted Haggard that GOD HATES the sin, but still loves the sinner. He may not be as popular and certainly Doug Giles wouldn’t be as happy with him. So Ted didn’t confess until he was caught and I don’t see repentance and healing in the future – although I don’t know that I’d trust him at this point.

The third thing that happened of significance recently is that my daughter had a Reformation Party. It was a great idea to have a party on October 31 that let people dress up. Since my roots are in the Baptist church and we never celebrated the ‘church’ holidays, I had never given much thought to the Reformation or what it meant to the ordinary person.

However, since that Tuesday, I have read a lot about Luther’s 95 theses. The first four theses are about the significance of repentance in the individual believer’s life. The rest of the theses cover things like the power of the church leaders and their abuses. (Hummmmm.)

It was Luther’s contention that penalties for sin were to be tests of true contrition – not chances for the rich to buy favors with the church. He pronounced that those who think that they are saved because they bought favors with the church are certainly damned.

Interesting stuff.

At the Reformation Party we also celebrated the life if William Tyndale who translated the Bible into English because he felt that the people NEEDED to have God’s word accessible to read on their own.

So what does all that mean to me? First of all, I’d LOVE to translate the 95 theses into today’s situations and paste them on the doors of the churches in America! Second of all, I’d LOVE to hear a pastor that wasn’t just ANGRY and outspoken about sin – but broken and weeping over the state of the country! I’d LOVE for there to be a humbling call to repentance and an out cry for healing throughout this country.

But I also think that there needs to be a grass – roots movement – not one from the organized churches. I think that God is stirring individuals to seek first of all His Word and second of all He is stirring people to seek HIS FACE; to petition for His mercy, to weep over the sins that fill our lives, that repentance might not be on the surface only but deep, honest and true.

And so I’ve decided that I’m calling for a Reformation of sorts. My next blog will post Pam’s 25 theses. Things that I think should be obvious to believers and the church but for what ever reason they aren’t. I will post them on the virtual door post and cry for a chance to dialog.

Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of the Church in America presented in 25 theses;
by common Christian Pam Davis;
Out of love and concern for the truth, and with the object of eliciting it, the following points will be the subject of a public discussion in the blogsphere She requests that whoever cannot be present personally to debate the matter orally will do so in absence in writing.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, mom! This is great, and cute at the same time!
I feel the same frustration as you with the world, and the Church. Fit Bodies, Fat Minds by Os Guiness is a good book about this subject -- he gives 9 or so reasons (by chapter) that American Christianity has slid away from strong roots. I don't agree with all of his thoughts, necessarily, but it is excellent "food for thought."
love ya!

7:20 AM  
Blogger David Porta said...

"The sign that points to Boston, doesn't have to go there."

//Now Ted Haggard would have passed Doug Guiles’ acid test. It is obvious that the members of his church appreciated that he stood for something. It was attractive to them. He was very vocally pro-Israel and anti-gay marriage. He took a stand on the moral and political issues of the times. Doug Guiles would be proud.//

//So I guess that I’d add another reason for pastor’s not speaking out against the issues. If a pastor is honest -- it’s hard to speak against sins that are pets.//

Haggard was dishonest? Well, yeah, I guess, for a while, when he he was first exposed, he denied it. That was dishonest of him.

But, up until then, was he dishonest? As long as they asked him no questions, he told them no lies.

All sinners are hypocrites. "Never steal anything small." Haggard knew right from wrong, and he preached it.

Jonah Goldberg writes...
http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg120800.shtml
//
The German philosopher Max Scheler (1874-1928) was renowned for his ethical deliberations. He took the moral and ethical realm intensely seriously, writing such works as On Man's Place in the Cosmos.

Alas, he could have also written a book called "On Man's Place in the Pink Pussycat's VIP Lounge."

When Scheler was confronted with the apparently blatant hypocrisy of his playing Iggy-the-Bongo with women not his wife, Scheler reportedly responded, "the sign that points to Boston, doesn't have to go there." In other words, one can legitimately point out the right thing, even if one doesn't do it him or herself.
//

Q: What is the difference between ethics and morality?

A: The ethical man knows he shouldn't cheat on his wife. The moral man doesn't cheat on hus wife.

1:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home